Kitchen v. Pitney
119 A. 675, 94 N.J. Eq. 485, 9 Stock. 485, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 668
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Pi elder.
For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, ELatzenbacii, White, PIbppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14.
For reversal—-None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kitchen v. Pitney, 119 A. 675, 94 N.J. Eq. 485, 9 Stock. 485, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 668 (N.J. 1923).
119 A. 675 (Kitchen v. Pitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodstown National Bank, C., Co. v. Snelbaker
40 A.2d 222 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Sheen v. Sheen
8 A.2d 136 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Conway v. Third Nat. Bank, C., Camden
177 A. 113 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Caldwell National Bank v. Rickard
143 A. 745 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Bloomer v. Bloomer
131 A. 388 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)