Kitchen v. Peguese
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6192
TREMAINE L. KITCHEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES PEGUESE, Warden; SHAVELLA WATKINS, Sergeant; FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; CAROL JACKSON, ARC Coordinator; KENNY TOWNES; CAPTAIN GRANT; LIEUTENANT SPENCE; OFFICER JOHNSON; GHIRLCHILICH, Hearing Officer; OFFICER GREENE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-00466-DKC)
Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 17, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tremaine L. Kitchen, Appellant Pro Se. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Tremaine L. Kitchen appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Kitchen v. Peguese, No. 8:05-cv-00466-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 23, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kitchen v. Peguese (Kitchen v. Peguese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.