Kitchen v. Peguese

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kitchen v. Peguese. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F. App'x 443
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2006·No. 06-6192·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6192

TREMAINE L. KITCHEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES PEGUESE, Warden; SHAVELLA WATKINS, Sergeant; FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; CAROL JACKSON, ARC Coordinator; KENNY TOWNES; CAPTAIN GRANT; LIEUTENANT SPENCE; OFFICER JOHNSON; GHIRLCHILICH, Hearing Officer; OFFICER GREENE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-00466-DKC)

Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 17, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tremaine L. Kitchen, Appellant Pro Se. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Tremaine L. Kitchen appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Kitchen v. Peguese, No. 8:05-cv-00466-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 23, 2005).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kitchen v. Peguese, (4th Cir. 2006).

Kitchen v. Peguese (Kitchen v. Peguese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related