Kitagawa v. Holder
This text of Kitagawa v. Holder (Kitagawa v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 29 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
TOMAS VILLATITO KITAGAWA; No. 05-76455 ELENITA GREGORIO KITAGAWA; MARIA KRISTINA KITAGAWA; Agency Nos. A075-306-620 RAYMOND GREGORIO KITAGAWA; A075-306-621 RICHARD GREGORIO KITAGAWA, A075-306-622 A075-306-623 Petitioners, A075-306-624
v. ORDER ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 1, 2010 * Submission deferred March 15, 2010 Resubmitted April 29, 2011 San Francisco, California
Before: HUG, REINHARDT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Respondent’s unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of
Immigration Appeals is granted.
Based upon the agreement of the parties, and pursuant to Appendix A(52) of
the General Orders, the Court orders that petitioners’ removal is stayed pending a
Board decision in this matter.
As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and
costs.
This order served on the agency shall act as and for the mandate of this
court.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kitagawa v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kitagawa-v-holder-ca9-2011.