Kit Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Ninth Circuit

Kit Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

365 F.2d 829, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2856, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5222

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 10, 1966

Docket20604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 F.2d 829 (Kit Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kit Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 365 F.2d 829, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2856, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5222 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner’s petition for review is denied for the reason that this court is of the opinion that the labor board’s determination that petitioner was guilty of an unfair labor practice (in the context of the facts here) was not clearly erroneous.

This court does not reach the issue of whether the use of a union label can be, in other circumstances, within the ambit of mandatory bargaining of employers and unions.

In the event the respondent advises the court within 60 days from date that petitioner has signed the contract, the subject of this review, the petition for adjudication of civil contempt will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI