Kistler v. Johnson

90 N.W. 1133, 86 Minn. 444, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 20, 1902
DocketNos. 12,882-(150)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 N.W. 1133 (Kistler v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kistler v. Johnson, 90 N.W. 1133, 86 Minn. 444, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536 (Mich. 1902).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

This action was brought to recover compensation for medical services performed by' the plaintiff, alleged to have been at the special instance and request of defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff.

[445]*445The evidence supports the verdict, and the various assignments of error in most respects refer to immaterial and collateral matters and do not warrant consideration. We find no reversible error.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Potokar
15 N.W.2d 158 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.W. 1133, 86 Minn. 444, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kistler-v-johnson-minn-1902.