Kistler v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kistler v. Johnson

90 N.W. 1133, 86 Minn. 444, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 20, 1902·No. Nos. 12,882-(150)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

This action was brought to recover compensation for medical services performed by' the plaintiff, alleged to have been at the special instance and request of defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff.

[445] The evidence supports the verdict, and the various assignments of error in most respects refer to immaterial and collateral matters and do not warrant consideration. We find no reversible error.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.'

This action was brought to recover compensation for medical services performed by' the plaintiff, alleged to have been at the special instance and request of defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff.

[445] The evidence supports the verdict, and the various assignments of error in most respects refer to immaterial and collateral matters and do not warrant consideration. We find no reversible error.

Order affirmed.

Kistler v. Johnson, 90 N.W. 1133, 86 Minn. 444, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536 (Mich. 1902).

Pincite

90 N.W. 1133 (Kistler v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related