Kistler v. Faller
164 A.2d 13, 401 Pa. 192, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 515
This text of 164 A.2d 13 (Kistler v. Faller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kistler v. Faller, 164 A.2d 13, 401 Pa. 192, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 515 (Pa. 1960).
Opinion
Opinion
The chancellor’s findings of fact, which, on exceptions thereto, were affirmed by the court en banc, are supported by substantial evidence and justify the legal conclusion reached.
Decree affirmed. Appellant to pay costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.2d 13, 401 Pa. 192, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kistler-v-faller-pa-1960.