Kistler v. COMMONWEALTH, STATE ETHICS COMMISSION

972 A.2d 482
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 19, 2009·No. 740 MAL 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*483 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, paraphrased, are:

a. Whether a public official may violate § 1103(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), despite lacking the intent to use his office for private pecuniary gain.
b. Whether § 1103(f) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act requires competitive bidding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kistler v. COMMONWEALTH, STATE ETHICS COMMISSION, 972 A.2d 482 (Pa. 2009).

972 A.2d 482 (Kistler v. COMMONWEALTH, STATE ETHICS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kistler v. Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission
22 A.3d 223 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)