Kisstin Dione Campbell v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 2013
Docket07-12-00517-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kisstin Dione Campbell v. State (Kisstin Dione Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kisstin Dione Campbell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-00517-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JANUARY 11, 2013 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KISSTIN DIONE CAMPBELL, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 22,721-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appearing pro se, appellant Kisstin Dione Campbell appeals her conviction for forgery by possession and resulting sentence of a fine and confinement for one year in a state jail. The trial court's certification of right of appeal states appellant made a plea-bargain agreement and has no right of appeal and appellant waived the right of appeal. By letter, we notified appellant her appeal was subject to dismissal unless by January 7, 2013, she furnished an amended certificate indicating a right of appeal or demonstrated other grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant filed a response but did not include an amended certificate authorizing a right of appeal. Rather, she argued her court-appointed trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. We find the absence of an amended certification demonstrating the right of appeal requires its dismissal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) ("The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules"); see Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (appellate court must dismiss prohibited appeal without further action). James T. Campbell Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kisstin Dione Campbell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kisstin-dione-campbell-v-state-texapp-2013.