Kissinger v. Lane
This text of 193 N.E.2d 63 (Kissinger v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, Leo Grant Kissinger, a prisoner in the Indiana State Prison, Michigan City, Indiana, has submitted to the clerk of this Court a purported application for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted of safe burglary and sentenced to the Indiana State Prisión for a term of five to ten years. The conviction was appealed to this Court and the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. Blume [and Kissinger] v. State (1963), 244 Ind. 121, 189 N. E. 2d 568. Subsequently, the petition for rehearing was denied.
This court has no jurisdiction to entertain applications for writs of habeas corpus. Jones v. Dowd, Warden (1941), 219 Ind. 114, 37 N. E. 2d 68. The documents heretofore submitted to the clerk of this Court by the petitioner are therefore ordered stricken from the records of the Clerk’s office.
Note. — Reported in 193 N. E. 2d 63.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 N.E.2d 63, 244 Ind. 376, 1963 Ind. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissinger-v-lane-ind-1963.