Kissinger v. Jacobs
This text of 113 N.Y.S. 819 (Kissinger v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The evidence upon which this judgment was rendered against the defendant is altogether insufficient to sustain it. The plaintiff sued for the value of work performed in repairing machinery and for furnishing materials. The evidence shows that the plaintiff did this work and furnished the materials pursuant to the order of the defendant’s husband. The fact that the defendant was present when her husband gave the order, and that he consulted with her in reference to it, is not sufficient to charge her with liability for her husband’s debt.
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide Jhe event.
GIEDERSLEEVE, P. J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 N.Y.S. 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissinger-v-jacobs-nyappterm-1908.