Kissenger v. New York & Harlem Railroad

4 Jones & S. 572
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 28, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Jones & S. 572 (Kissenger v. New York & Harlem Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kissenger v. New York & Harlem Railroad, 4 Jones & S. 572 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Opinion

Action for damages for injury to property and person.

E. F. Shepard, for appellant. M. L. Townsend, for respondent.

Opinion by Van Vorst, J. Freedman and Curtis, JJ., concurred.

Appeal from judgment for plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Jones & S. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissenger-v-new-york-harlem-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1873.