Kissell v. State

831 So. 2d 790, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17837, 2002 WL 31728808
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 2002
DocketNo. 5D02-352
StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 790 (Kissell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kissell v. State, 831 So. 2d 790, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17837, 2002 WL 31728808 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant complains of the trial court’s denial of his motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court correctly denied this claim.

The State concedes that the written sentence contains an error in that the sentence orally pronounced was fifteen years but the written sentence shows sixteen years. We remand for this correction to be made.

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED.

HARRIS and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 So. 2d 790, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17837, 2002 WL 31728808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissell-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.