Kissel Motor Co. v. Docauer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kissel Motor Co. v. Docauer

198 Ill. App. 43

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 14, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,838

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 43 (Kissel Motor Co. v. Docauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kissel Motor Co. v. Docauer, 198 Ill. App. 43 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Replevin, § 156*—when order for return of mortgaged property not proper. In an action of replevin for property held under a chattel mortgage, where the evidence shows that at the time of the trial all the notes were due, that the condition of the mortgage was broken and plaintiff was entitled to possession of the mortgaged property, it is improper to 'order the return of the property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Replevin, § 156*—when order for return of mortgaged property not proper. In an action of replevin for property held under a chattel mortgage, where the evidence shows that at the time of the trial all the notes were due, that the condition of the mortgage was broken and plaintiff was entitled to possession of the mortgaged property, it is improper to 'order the return of the property.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Ill. App. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kissel-motor-co-v-docauer-illappct-1916.