Kissecker v. Monn
36 Pa. 313
Opinion
The charge of the learned Judge of the Common Pleas is so well adapted to the case, and so just in its principles, [317] that we do not feel called' upon to do more than express our approval of it. It is quite evident, that the verdict is founded on the second and third counts; but the first is good, and it does not hurt the defendant, that the judgment was entered on all of them.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kissecker v. Monn, 36 Pa. 313 (Pa. 1860).
36 Pa. 313 (Kissecker v. Monn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bennett v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.
24 Pa. D. & C.2d 59 (Cambria County Court of Common Pleas, 1960)
Dussell v. Kaufman Construction Co.
157 A.2d 740 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Truby v. American Natural Gas Co.
38 Pa. Super. 166 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)