Kisor v. Shulkin

Federal Circuit

Kisor v. Shulkin

880 F.3d 1378

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 2018

Docket2016-1929

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 880 F.3d 1378 (Kisor v. Shulkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kisor v. Shulkin, 880 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinions

O’Malley, Circuit Judge, with whom Newman and Moore, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from' the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

ORDER

Per Curiam.

Appellant filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by the. appellee.

The petition for rehearing was 'referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

[1379]*1379The petition for rehearing en bane is denied.

The mandate of the court will be issued on February 7,2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI