Kisor v. Shulkin

880 F.3d 1378
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 31, 2018·No. 2016-1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

O’Malley, Circuit Judge, with whom Newman and Moore, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from' the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

ORDER

Per Curiam.

Appellant filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by the. appellee.

The petition for rehearing was 'referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

[1379] The petition for rehearing en bane is denied.

The mandate of the court will be issued on February 7,2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kisor v. Shulkin, 880 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

880 F.3d 1378 (Kisor v. Shulkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nova v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
48 F.4th 1307 (Federal Circuit, 2022)
Kisor v. McDonough
Federal Circuit, 2021
Kisor v. Wilkie
588 U.S. 558 (Supreme Court, 2019)
181004-804
Board of Veterans' Appeals, 2019
Procopio v. Wilkie
913 F.3d 1371 (Federal Circuit, 2019)