Kishun v. Astrue

416 F. App'x 266
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2011·No. No. 10-1276·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dian C. Kishun appeals the district court’s order granting Astrue’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, affirming the decision of the administrative law judge, and denying Kishun’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kishun v. Astrue, No. 5:08-cv-00614-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kishun v. Astrue, 416 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2011).

416 F. App'x 266 (Kishun v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.