Kish v. State
884 So. 2d 255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11830, 2004 WL 1809863
This text of 884 So. 2d 255 (Kish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kish v. State, 884 So. 2d 255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11830, 2004 WL 1809863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
We affirm Nelson Kish’s designation as a sexual predator. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA) (holding that the Florida Sexual Predators Act did not violate constitutional guarantee of procedural due process), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with [256]*256Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Milks v. State
848 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11830, 2004 WL 1809863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kish-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.