Kish v. State
884 So. 2d 255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11830, 2004 WL 1809863
Opinion
We affirm Nelson Kish’s designation as a sexual predator. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA) (holding that the Florida Sexual Predators Act did not violate constitutional guarantee of procedural due process), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with [256] Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kish v. State, 884 So. 2d 255, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11830, 2004 WL 1809863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 255 (Kish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milks v. State
848 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)