Kiser v. State
Opinion
Cary Kiser appeals the revocation of his pi’obation and sentence. Appointed appellate counsel has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant admitted violating his probation by *1203 committing new offenses. The record, however, does not reflect a written order revoking probation. We affirm the revocation and sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. Smith v. State, 6 So.3d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Affirmed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
10 So. 3d 1202 (Kiser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.