Kiser v. Jackson

CourtDistrict Court, D. Montana
DecidedMarch 11, 2024
Docket9:22-cv-00181
StatusUnknown

This text of Kiser v. Jackson (Kiser v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kiser v. Jackson, (D. Mont. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

KATHERINE KISER, CV 22-181-M—DWM Plaintiff, Vs. ENTRY OF DEFAULT TERRANCE JACKSON; BUREAU OF and ORDER INDIAN AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and DOES 1-5, Defendants.

Plaintiff Katherine Kiser has filed a motion for entry of a default judgment against Defendant Terrance Jackson pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Doc. 40.) Kiser requests the following damages: 1. Past Medical $140,706.42 2. Future Medical $428,006.49 3. Pain/Suffering $550,000.00 4, Emotional Distress $550,000.00

A complaint’s factual allegations relating to the amount of damages are not taken

as true on default. Geddes v. United Fin. Grp., 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977). A plaintiff seeking default judgment must present “an evidentiary basis for the damages sought.” Cement & Concrete Workers Dist. Council Welfare Fund v. Metro Found. Contrs. Inc., 699 F.3d 230, 234 (2d Cir. 2012). Further evidence is therefore required before Kiser’s request can be reduced to judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Defendant Terrance Jackson has failed to timely appear or answer Plaintiffs Complaint. Defendant Jackson was duly served with a copy of the Summons and Complaint in this action on December 6, 2022. Defendant has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend within the time allowed, and therefore is now in default. Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DEFAULT is hereby entered against Defendant Terrance Jackson. (2) Onor before March 25, 2023, Kiser must file a detailed declaration with supporting documentation to show how she has calculated her proposed damages. Also by that date, Kiser must file a short brief applying the factors outlined in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986), to this case. (3) Anevidentiary hearing on damages is set for April 2, 2024, at 9:00

a.m. at the Russell Smith Federal Courthouse in Missoula, Montana. The hearing will be limited to 30 minutes. The hearing will be vacated if the Court determines

that the documentary evidence provides a sufficient basis to grant the requested relief. See Davis v. Fendler, 650 F.2d 1154, 1161-62 (9th Cir. 1981) (affirming default judgment with damages assessed based on documentary evidence). DATED this I day of March, 2024.

Donald/W. Molloy, District Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kiser v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiser-v-jackson-mtd-2024.