Kiser & Co. v. Gamble
This text of 75 Ala. 386 (Kiser & Co. v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If we concede that the evidence satisfactorily shows that the respondent, George W. Gamble, made the conveyance, which is assailed in the bill as fraudulent, with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud his creditors, it is not clear to us that the grantee, Mrs. Gamble, participated in such fraudulent intent. This was requisite in order to vitiate the bonafides of the conveyance, which was unquestionably based upon the valuable consideration of a large debt due by the grantor to the grantee, belonging to her statutory separate estate.—Warren & Burch v. Jones, 68 Ala. 449 ; Marshall v. Croom, 60 Ala. 121; Coleman v. Smith, 55 Ala. 369 ; Flewellen v. Crane, 58 Ala. 627.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Ala. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiser-co-v-gamble-ala-1883.