Kischel v. Flamik

260 A.D. 938, 23 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541

Opinion

In an action for false arrest and imprisonment, judgment for defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. The showing as contained in the depositions and information called upon the defendant as a justice of the peace to make a judicial determination, for which he cannot be held liable even though it were erroneous. (Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 239 N. Y. 148, 152; Swart v. Richard, 148 id. 264; Smith v. Bell & Fyfe Foundry Co., 127 App. Div. 278; McCarg v. Burr, 106 id. 275, 279.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kischel v. Flamik, 260 A.D. 938, 23 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 938 (Kischel v. Flamik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co.
145 N.E. 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Smith v. Bell & Fyfe Foundry Co.
127 A.D. 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)