Kischel v. Flamik

260 A.D. 938, 23 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541

This text of 260 A.D. 938 (Kischel v. Flamik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kischel v. Flamik, 260 A.D. 938, 23 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

In an action for false arrest and imprisonment, judgment for defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. The showing as contained in the depositions and information called upon the defendant as a justice of the peace to make a judicial determination, for which he cannot be held liable even though it were erroneous. (Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 239 N. Y. 148, 152; Swart v. Richard, 148 id. 264; Smith v. Bell & Fyfe Foundry Co., 127 App. Div. 278; McCarg v. Burr, 106 id. 275, 279.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co.
145 N.E. 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Smith v. Bell & Fyfe Foundry Co.
127 A.D. 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 938, 23 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kischel-v-flamik-nyappdiv-1940.