Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp.
This text of 18 A.D.2d 906 (Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order entered November 20, 1961, made on motion of the Justice presiding denying the application for ¡a preference in this action for personal injuries, unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. No appeal lies from an ex parte order. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Weisberg v. McGuigan, 12 A D 2d 450; Gouvakis v. 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 A D 2d 1035.) Appellant’s remedy is a motion for reconsideration. (Vallen v. Fifth Ave. Coach Corp., 5 A D 2d 769.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A.D.2d 906, 237 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirzon-v-louis-marcus-corp-nyappdiv-1963.