Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp.

18 A.D.2d 906, 237 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from order entered November 20, 1961, made on motion of the Justice presiding denying the application for ¡a preference in this action for personal injuries, unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. No appeal lies from an ex parte order. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Weisberg v. McGuigan, 12 A D 2d 450; Gouvakis v. 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 A D 2d 1035.) Appellant’s remedy is a motion for reconsideration. (Vallen v. Fifth Ave. Coach Corp., 5 A D 2d 769.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order entered November 20, 1961, made on motion of the Justice presiding denying the application for ¡a preference in this action for personal injuries, unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. No appeal lies from an ex parte order. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Weisberg v. McGuigan, 12 A D 2d 450; Gouvakis v. 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 A D 2d 1035.) Appellant’s remedy is a motion for reconsideration. (Vallen v. Fifth Ave. Coach Corp., 5 A D 2d 769.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp., 18 A.D.2d 906, 237 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

18 A.D.2d 906 (Kirzon v. Louis Marcus Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related