Kirzhner v. Purepower Technologies LLC
This text of 566 F. App'x 239 (Kirzhner v. Purepower Technologies LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krizhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC, No. 3:12-cv-01802-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 F. App'x 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirzhner-v-purepower-technologies-llc-ca4-2014.