Kirwin, T. v. Sussman Automotive
This text of Kirwin, T. v. Sussman Automotive (Kirwin, T. v. Sussman Automotive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
THOMAS KIRWIN AND DIANNE KIRWIN, : No. 796 MAL 2016 : Petitioners : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : SUSSMAN AUTOMOTIVE D/B/A/ : SUSSMAN MAZDA AND ERIC : SUSSMAN, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kirwin, T. v. Sussman Automotive, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirwin-t-v-sussman-automotive-pa-2017.