Kirtsey v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kirtsey v. State of Florida

649 So. 2d 946, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1995 WL 59580

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2078

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 649 So. 2d 946 (Kirtsey v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirtsey v. State of Florida, 649 So. 2d 946, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1995 WL 59580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Although the opening of the prosecutor’s final argument¹ was improper, see Baker v. State, 578 So.2d 37, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Salazar-Rodriguez v. State, 436 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and the objection to it was incorrectly overruled, we are convinced that the error was harmless². State, v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Hall v. State, 444 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Although the opening of the prosecutor’s final argument¹ was improper, see Baker v. State, 578 So.2d 37, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Salazar-Rodriguez v. State, 436 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and the objection to it was incorrectly overruled, we are convinced that the error was harmless². State, v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Hall v. State, 444 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 So. 2d 946, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1995 WL 59580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirtsey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack