Kirtley v. State

619 So. 2d 35, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460, 1993 WL 196326
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1993·No. No. 92-00102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and the finding that he was in violation of the conditions of community control. However, we remand for resentencing using the original guideline scoresheet. See Harris v. State, 574 So.2d 1211 (Fla.2d DCA 1991). At resentencing the guideline range may be increased by one cell due to the violation of community control.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirtley v. State, 619 So. 2d 35, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460, 1993 WL 196326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

619 So. 2d 35 (Kirtley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
574 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)