Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 3, 2021
Docket03-21-00384-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC (Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00384-CV

Kirsten Hanna; Upside Up Properties, LLC; and Upside Up Ventures, Inc., Appellants

v.

M. Matthew Williams; David Howell; Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams; and Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, Appellees

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-000957, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate their appeal so that they may

cure a “potential jurisdictional impediment” by having the trial court sever appellees’

counterclaim from the underlying proceeding. We grant the motion and abate this appeal

pending further order from this Court, with appellate deadlines tolled during the abatement

period. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.2 (“The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not

final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all proceedings

relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.”). Appellants are instructed to file either a

motion to reinstate the appeal with a supplemental clerk’s record demonstrating that the

judgment is a final appealable judgment or a status report on or before February 1, 2022. Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Abated

Filed: December 3, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kirsten Hanna Upside Up Properties, LLC And Upside Up Ventures, Inc. v. M. Matthew Williams David Howell Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams And Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirsten-hanna-upside-up-properties-llc-and-upside-up-ventures-inc-v-m-texapp-2021.