Kirsten Cook v. Kenneth Cook

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: September 14, 2018
• Docket: 17-55543
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIRSTEN COOK and ESTATE OF No. 17-55543 ETHAN COOK, D.C. No. 8:15-cv-01448-CJC-JCG Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

KENNETH ALAN COOK; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for Central California, Santa Ana Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2018

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order entered

December 6, 2016 (Dkt. 167), and its order entered February 8, 2017 (Dkt. 182).

Under the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P . 34(a)(2) to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. See Brown v. Lucky

Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir. 2001) (stating standard).1

AFFIRMED.

1 Appellant’s motion for an extension of time in which to file a reply brief (Dkt. No. 78) is DENIED.