Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Company
182 N.E. 165, 259 N.Y. 525, 84 A.L.R. 654, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 998
This text of 182 N.E. 165 (Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Company, 182 N.E. 165, 259 N.Y. 525, 84 A.L.R. 654, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 998 (N.Y. 1932).
Opinion
Motion for reargument and to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 258 N. Y. 489.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commercial Warehouse Co. v. Hyder Brothers, Inc.
411 P.2d 978 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1966)
Mitterlehner v. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas
378 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Fedor v. Mauwehu Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.
143 A.2d 466 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1958)
Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.
125 A.2d 884 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Zimmerman v. Daggett & Ramsdell
111 A.2d 448 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
182 N.E. 165, 259 N.Y. 525, 84 A.L.R. 654, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirshenbaum-v-general-outdoor-advertising-company-ny-1932.