Kirshenbaum v. Berson
This text of 19 Misc. 2d 787 (Kirshenbaum v. Berson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tenant is not entitled to recover for the expense of the exterminator service which he voluntarily incurred (Perlmutter v. Timely Toys, 8 A D 2d 834; Davar Holdings v. Cohen, 255 App. Div. 445, affd. 280 N. Y. 828; Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. 108 W. 49th St. Corp., 255 App. Div. 570).
The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law and facts by increasing landlord’s recovery to $63.67, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal to either party.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Final order modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Misc. 2d 787, 195 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirshenbaum-v-berson-nyappterm-1959.