Kirschner v. Hirschberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirschner v. Hirschberg

90 N.Y.S. 351

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the [352]*352work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the [352]*352work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Kirschner v. Hirschberg, 90 N.Y.S. 351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 351 (Kirschner v. Hirschberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.