Kirschner v. Hirschberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirschner v. Hirschberg

90 N.Y.S. 351

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 351 (Kirschner v. Hirschberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirschner v. Hirschberg, 90 N.Y.S. 351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the [352]*352work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the [352]*352work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirschner-v-hirschberg-nyappterm-1904.