Kirschman v. Kirschman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Kirschman v. Kirschman

103 So. 3d 1083, 2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0794, 2012 WL 4846528, 2012 La. App. Unpub. LEXIS 545

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 31, 2012

DocketNo. 2012-C-0794

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 3d 1083 (Kirschman v. Kirschman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirschman v. Kirschman, 103 So. 3d 1083, 2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 0794, 2012 WL 4846528, 2012 La. App. Unpub. LEXIS 545 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Arnold L. Kirschman, Applying for Expedited Supervisory Writ, Directed to Honorable Paula A. Brown, Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, Division “J”, 2006-6464.

11WRIT GRANTED

The letters sent from Lisa Kirschman’s attorney to Arnold Kirschman’s former attorney are inadmissible unless the requirements listed in La. C. Evid. art. 508 are met. On the showing made, the prerequisites of Article 508 have not been met. Testimony from Mrs. Kirschman regarding the substance of the letters is hearsay under La. C. Evid. Art. 801 and serves only to circumvent the operation of Article 508. Accordingly, the evidentiary ruling is hereby reversed.

Ml Judge Paul A. Bonin

Is/ Judge Terri F. Love

Is/ Judge Max N. Tobias, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI