Kirschenstein v. Frank
This text of 271 A.D.2d 987 (Kirschenstein v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an attorney at law to recover the value of his services, judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury, after an assessment of the amount of plaintiff’s damages, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Hagarty, Acting P. J„, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirschenstein-v-frank-nyappdiv-1947.