Kirschbaum v. Sonnenberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kirschbaum v. Sonnenberg

104 N.W. 1149, 96 Minn. 533, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 593

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 10, 1905

DocketNos. 14,476—(69)

StatusPublished

This text of 104 N.W. 1149 (Kirschbaum v. Sonnenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirschbaum v. Sonnenberg, 104 N.W. 1149, 96 Minn. 533, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 593 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only assignment of error argued upon this appeal Is whether the verdict of the jury was justified by the evidence. We have taken it for granted that appellant has printed in the paper book all the evidence bearing upon the only issue in the case, which is: Did appellant’s lease expire October 1, 1904? We are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, and a discussion of it is not necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only assignment of error argued upon this appeal Is whether the verdict of the jury was justified by the evidence. We have taken it for granted that appellant has printed in the paper book all the evidence bearing upon the only issue in the case, which is: Did appellant’s lease expire October 1, 1904? We are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, and a discussion of it is not necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.W. 1149, 96 Minn. 533, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirschbaum-v-sonnenberg-minn-1905.