Kirschbaum v. Merchants Bank

272 A.D.2d 336

This text of 272 A.D.2d 336 (Kirschbaum v. Merchants Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirschbaum v. Merchants Bank, 272 A.D.2d 336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A member of a partnership seeking to recover from a third party a debt due the partnership must bring the action on behalf of and for the benefit of the partnership and may not recover upon such an obligation individually. The [337]*337cause of action resides in the partnership and not in one of its members. (Baron v. Lakow, 121 App. Div. 544.)

The order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should accordingly be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein, upon payment of said costs.

Cohn, Callahan, Peck and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion granted, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baron v. Lakow
121 A.D. 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirschbaum-v-merchants-bank-nyappdiv-1947.