Kirsch v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.
951 A.2d 257, 597 Pa. 222, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 902
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 11, 2008·No. Petition 446 EAL 2007·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW this 11th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:
1. Did the Commonwealth Court err by interpreting the “Leave for service with a collective bargaining organization” Section 8102 of the Retirement Code as preventing Petitioners from receiving full credit for the final average salaries *223 they earned while serving as officers in a collective bargaining organization?
2. Did the Commonwealth Court err by holding that Petitioners’ salaries artificially enhanced or inflated their retirement benefits?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirsch v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RET. BD., 951 A.2d 257, 597 Pa. 222, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 902 (Pa. 2008).
951 A.2d 257 (Kirsch v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board
985 A.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n
979 A.2d 442 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Anderson v. Abraham
951 A.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)