Kirsch v. Halbach

120 N.Y.S. 740
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 N.Y.S. 740 (Kirsch v. Halbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirsch v. Halbach, 120 N.Y.S. 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The stenographer’s minutes :of the trial in this case having been lost, it comes before this court upon affidavits as to what took place upon the trial in accordance with the provisions of section 319 of the Municipal Court Act. The affidavits filed herein are those of the attorneys for the respective parties, who were present at the trial, and who gave the names of the several witnesses sworn and the substance of their testimony. This method of presenting the testimony given upon the trial of a case is necessarily very unsatisfactory, and it is clear that there was a sharp conflict of evidence in the court below upon many material points. We think the interests of justice will be best subserved by ordering a new trial, without costs.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gottlieb v. Fine
121 N.Y.S. 236 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 N.Y.S. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirsch-v-halbach-nyappterm-1910.