Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 3, 2025·No. 01-24-00285-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 3, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

[his] decision to withdraw [his] appeal” and that he “no longer wish[es] to prosecute

this appeal.” And he asks this Court to dismiss the appeal.

Faltaous’s appointed counsel has signed the motion, and Faltaous has signed

the declaration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(b).

Accordingly, we grant Faltaous’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas (Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.