Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued July 3, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
[his] decision to withdraw [his] appeal” and that he “no longer wish[es] to prosecute
this appeal.” And he asks this Court to dismiss the appeal.
Faltaous’s appointed counsel has signed the motion, and Faltaous has signed
the declaration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(b).
Accordingly, we grant Faltaous’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas (Kirolos Hany Faltaous v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.