Kirner v. Skewis
This text of 373 P.2d 795 (Kirner v. Skewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the respondent (plaintiff) for the breach of a subcontract for the construction of a pipeline, and from the dismissal of appellants’ (defendants’) cross-complaint for the price of materials furnished respondent.
Upon adequate proof, the court found that the appellants abandoned the contract, and that, in consequence, respondent completed the work at his own expense. The court allowed the appellants the reasonable value of the materials furnished respondent. Only a dispute of fact is presented which cannot be retried here. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn. (2d) 570, 343 P. (2d) 183.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 P.2d 795, 60 Wash. 2d 899, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirner-v-skewis-wash-1962.