Kirner v. Skewis

373 P.2d 795, 60 Wash. 2d 899, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 398
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 9, 1962·No. No. 36097·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the respondent (plaintiff) for the breach of a subcontract for the construction of a pipeline, and from the dismissal of appellants’ (defendants’) cross-complaint for the price of materials furnished respondent.

Upon adequate proof, the court found that the appellants abandoned the contract, and that, in consequence, respondent completed the work at his own expense. The court allowed the appellants the reasonable value of the materials furnished respondent. Only a dispute of fact is presented which cannot be retried here. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn. (2d) 570, 343 P. (2d) 183.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirner v. Skewis, 373 P.2d 795, 60 Wash. 2d 899, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 398 (Wash. 1962).

373 P.2d 795 (Kirner v. Skewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.
343 P.2d 183 (Washington Supreme Court, 1959)