Kirman v. Hunnewill

California Supreme Court

Kirman v. Hunnewill

27 P. 587, 91 Cal. 157, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1065

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 11, 1891

DocketNo. 14463

StatusPublished

This text of 27 P. 587 (Kirman v. Hunnewill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirman v. Hunnewill, 27 P. 587, 91 Cal. 157, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1065 (Cal. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

The judgment in this cause was entered November 2, 1888, and the appeal therefrom was not.taken until more than one year thereafter; viz., December 8, 1890. The motion to dismiss the appeal therefrom must therefore be granted.

Whether the appellants are entitled to have the execution of the judgment stayed until the determination of the appeal from the order denying a new trial cannot be considered upon this motion. (See Fulton v. Hanna, 40 Cal. 278.)

The appeal from the judgment is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI