Kirkwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kirkwood v. State

426 So. 2d 68, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27760

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1983·No. No. AL-127·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Kirkwood pled nolo contendere to armed robbery. He appeals his sentencing as an adult. We affirm.

The record reveals that the trial court carefully considered each of the factors listed in Section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). The findings as to each factor are supported by the record.

The court also considered providing youthful offender treatment to Kirkwood. Kirkwood’s prior criminal record supports its denial of this favored status to Kirk-wood. Kirkwood received a legal sentence. This court will not interfere in the trial court’s sentencing function.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Kirkwood pled nolo contendere to armed robbery. He appeals his sentencing as an adult. We affirm.

The record reveals that the trial court carefully considered each of the factors listed in Section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). The findings as to each factor are supported by the record.

The court also considered providing youthful offender treatment to Kirkwood. Kirkwood’s prior criminal record supports its denial of this favored status to Kirk-wood. Kirkwood received a legal sentence. This court will not interfere in the trial court’s sentencing function.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Kirkwood v. State, 426 So. 2d 68, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

426 So. 2d 68 (Kirkwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related