Kirkwood v. D. Domnau & Brother

80 Tex. 645
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 1, 1891
DocketNo. 7112
StatusPublished

This text of 80 Tex. 645 (Kirkwood v. D. Domnau & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkwood v. D. Domnau & Brother, 80 Tex. 645 (Tex. 1891).

Opinion

HENRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the defendants in error for partition of a house and lot in the city of Waco. Bettie Kirkwood was once the wife of G. W. Allen. The property in [647]*647then Knox would not lose the benefit of his nse of the land and would not be entitled to the interest on the purchase money received by his warrantors. If this can not be done, and if Mshould again show himself a possessor in good faith, he should br *ured the value of the interest in his improvements lost by him, a «ling to the rule laid down in the statute (Rev. Stats., art. 4813, el Sejfjand will be entitled to interest on his recovery against his codefendants.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Delivered May 1, 1891.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Tex. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkwood-v-d-domnau-brother-tex-1891.