Kirksey v. State

729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5311, 1999 WL 242372
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3116
StatusPublished

This text of 729 So. 2d 1016 (Kirksey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirksey v. State, 729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5311, 1999 WL 242372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). As in Locke, we certify the following question to be one of great public importance: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Locke v. State
719 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5311, 1999 WL 242372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirksey-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.