Kirksey v. Kirksey

8 Ala. 131
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

The inclination of my mind, is, that the loss and inconvenience, which the plaintiff sustained in breaking up, and moving to the defendant’s, a distance of sixty miles, is a sufficient consideration to support the promise, to furnish her with a house, and land to cultivate, until she could raise her family. My brothers, however think, that the promise on the part of the defendant, was a mere gratuity, and that an action will not lie for its breach. The judgment of the Court below must therefore be reversed, pursuant to the agreement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirksey v. Kirksey, 8 Ala. 131 (Ala. 1845).

8 Ala. 131 (Kirksey v. Kirksey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Accounting of Brown
196 Misc. 979 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Housman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
105 F.2d 973 (Second Circuit, 1939)
Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.
161 A. 571 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Head v. Baldwin
83 Ala. 132 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Hubbard v. Allen
59 Ala. 283 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Bibb v. Freeman
59 Ala. 612 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Hawkins v. Hudson
45 Ala. 482 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871)
Bowin & Co. v. Sutherlin
44 Ala. 278 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1870)
Morris v. Lewis'
33 Ala. 53 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Erwin v. Erwin
25 Ala. 236 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1854)
Forward v. Armstead
12 Ala. 124 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)