Kirksey v. Alabama
136 S. Ct. 2409, 195 L. Ed. 2d 777, 84 U.S.L.W. 3664, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3711
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 6, 2016
DocketNo. 15–7912.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases
This text of 136 S. Ct. 2409 (Kirksey v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirksey v. Alabama, 136 S. Ct. 2409, 195 L. Ed. 2d 777, 84 U.S.L.W. 3664, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3711 (U.S. 2016).
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further consideration in light of Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. ----,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kirksey v. State
240 So. 3d 525 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida
202 So. 3d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Rauf v. State
145 A.3d 430 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 S. Ct. 2409, 195 L. Ed. 2d 777, 84 U.S.L.W. 3664, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirksey-v-alabama-scotus-2016.