Kirkpatrick v. Stelling

311 U.S. 607, 61 S. Ct. 29
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1940·No. No. 222·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion'to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Honeyman v. Jacobs, 306 U. S. 539; Richmond Mortgage Corporation v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick v. Stelling, 311 U.S. 607, 61 S. Ct. 29 (1940).

311 U.S. 607 (Kirkpatrick v. Stelling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honeyman v. Jacobs
306 U.S. 539 (Supreme Court, 1939)