Kirkpatrick v. State
This text of 120 S.E. 560 (Kirkpatrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The accused was charged with murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The verdict was authorized, under the evidence and the defendant’s statement. Indeed, a verdict of murder would have been amply supported by the evidence, and the accused was fortunate in being convicted of the lesser offense.
The charge of the court was more favorable to the defendant than the law and the facts required, and was not subject to any of the exceptions taken thereto.
The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 S.E. 560, 31 Ga. App. 314, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-state-gactapp-1923.