Kirkpatrick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kirkpatrick v. State

77 S.E. 104, 12 Ga. App. 252, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 522

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 11, 1913·No. 4127·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The various assignments of error based upon the alleged unconstitutionality of section 434 of the Penal Code of 1910 are eon- ■ trolled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff injerror, by the answer of the Supreme Court to the questions certified to it by this court in this case. 138 Ga. 794 (76 S. E. 53).

2. Where an agent of a non-resident dealer in intoxicating liquor distributes circulars and price-lists of such liquors, and, in connection " therewith, personally gives away samples of such intoxicating liquors in this State, he is guilty of soliciting, within the terms of section 434 of the Penal Code. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. The various assignments of error based upon the alleged unconstitutionality of section 434 of the Penal Code of 1910 are eon- ■ trolled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff injerror, by the answer of the Supreme Court to the questions certified to it by this court in this case. 138 Ga. 794 (76 S. E. 53).

2. Where an agent of a non-resident dealer in intoxicating liquor distributes circulars and price-lists of such liquors, and, in connection " therewith, personally gives away samples of such intoxicating liquors in this State, he is guilty of soliciting, within the terms of section 434 of the Penal Code. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Kirkpatrick v. State, 77 S.E. 104, 12 Ga. App. 252, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

77 S.E. 104 (Kirkpatrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related