Kirkpatrick v. Schuyler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kirkpatrick v. Schuyler

247 Ill. App. 404, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 56

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 31, 1927

DocketGen. No. 8,075

StatusPublished

This text of 247 Ill. App. 404 (Kirkpatrick v. Schuyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirkpatrick v. Schuyler, 247 Ill. App. 404, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 56 (Ill. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case an appeal is prosecuted from an order of the circuit court in Christian county, allowing the claim of Robert M. Kirkpatrick, an undertaker, for the use of the assignee, J. A. James, against the estate of Isabelle Bacon Whitlocke James, deceased. The claim is for funeral expenses incurred in the burial of the deceased. The deceased died testate leaving a solvent estate, and at the time of her death was the wife of Sydney W. James, who afterwards also died leaving an estate. In her will, which has been probated, the deceased wife provided for the payment of her funeral expenses out of her estate. It is contended, on appeal, that the husband or the husband’s estate is primarily liable for the funeral expenses of a deceased wife, and that therefore this claim should have been filed against the estate of the deceased husband, and that the allowance of the claim against the wife’s estate was erroneous. The statute makes provision for the filing and allowance of claims for funeral expenses against the estate of any decedent, regardless of whether the decedent is a husband or wife; and it also provides that such claims shall be entitled to precedence in payment as claims of the first class. Smith-Hurd Rev. St. ch. 3, sec. 71; Cahill’s St. ch. 3, ¶ 71. The order of the court allowing the claim for funeral expenses against the wife’s estate was therefore in compliance with the provisions of the statute, and was also in conformity with the direction given by the deceased wife in her last will and testament. An allowance of a claim against the estate of a deceased wife for funeral expenses is proper. Gustin for use of Atwood v. Bryden, 205 Ill. App. 204, 218. Judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case an appeal is prosecuted from an order of the circuit court in Christian county, allowing the claim of Robert M. Kirkpatrick, an undertaker, for the use of the assignee, J. A. James, against the estate of Isabelle Bacon Whitlocke James, deceased. The claim is for funeral expenses incurred in the burial of the deceased. The deceased died testate leaving a solvent estate, and at the time of her death was the wife of Sydney W. James, who afterwards also died leaving an estate. In her will, which has been probated, the deceased wife provided for the payment of her funeral expenses out of her estate. It is contended, on appeal, that the husband or the husband’s estate is primarily liable for the funeral expenses of a deceased wife, and that therefore this claim should have been filed against the estate of the deceased husband, and that the allowance of the claim against the wife’s estate was erroneous. The statute makes provision for the filing and allowance of claims for funeral expenses against the estate of any decedent, regardless of whether the decedent is a husband or wife; and it also provides that such claims shall be entitled to precedence in payment as claims of the first class. Smith-Hurd Rev. St. ch. 3, sec. 71; Cahill’s St. ch. 3, ¶ 71. The order of the court allowing the claim for funeral expenses against the wife’s estate was therefore in compliance with the provisions of the statute, and was also in conformity with the direction given by the deceased wife in her last will and testament. An allowance of a claim against the estate of a deceased wife for funeral expenses is proper. Gustin for use of Atwood v. Bryden, 205 Ill. App. 204, 218. Judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 Ill. App. 404, 1927 Ill. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-schuyler-illappct-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack