Kirkpatrick v. Preisler

385 U.S. 450, 87 S. Ct. 613

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 1967·No. 738·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 385 U.S. 450, 87 S. Ct. 613 (1967).

Pincite

385 U.S. 450 (Kirkpatrick v. Preisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.