Home/Supreme Court/Kirkpatrick v. Preisler

Kirkpatrick v. Preisler

385 U.S. 450, 87 S. Ct. 613
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 9, 1967
Docket738
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 385 U.S. 450 (Kirkpatrick v. Preisler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 385 U.S. 450, 87 S. Ct. 613 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anne Arundel County Republican Central Committee v. State Administrative Board of Election Laws
781 F. Supp. 394 (D. Maryland, 1991)
Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, Missouri
315 F. Supp. 627 (W.D. Missouri, 1970)
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
394 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri
279 F. Supp. 952 (W.D. Missouri, 1968)
Wells v. Rockefeller
273 F. Supp. 984 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Rockefeller v. Wells
389 U.S. 421 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Baker v. Ellington
273 F. Supp. 174 (M.D. Tennessee, 1967)
Nave v. City of Seattle
385 U.S. 450 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 450, 87 S. Ct. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-preisler-scotus-1967.